Chemistry

Home
Chemistry Links
Lecture PLUS
Chemistry Modules
Chemistry Books
Chemistry Quizzes

Using Student Centered Learning Strategies in the Chemistry Classroom

Karen Timberlake
Department of Chemistry, Los Angeles Valley College, Valley Glen, 91401
khemist@aol.com        http://www.karentimberlake.com                       http://www.lectureplus.com

If we consider that learning is enhanced when students are engaged in the processing of information, then our challenge as teachers is to find creative ways to design dynamic learning environments that involve students in doing and thinking about chemistry. Over the past few years, I have developed a teaching strategy, which I call LecturePLUS that converts the traditional lecture into a student-centered format.  The LecturePLUS environment integrates mini-lectures, formative assessments, and activity worksheets for team learning in the classroom.  

Background
Most of us who teach chemistry grew up learning chemistry from the lecture method.  For many years, I never doubted that it was the way to teach chemistry.  Today the lecture system is the preferred teaching style used by 89% of science professors.   Indeed, lecture is a comfortable format for many instructors and a non-threatening one for students.  It is low cost, easy to control, and an excellent method for organizing course content. However, many of us are becoming more aware that during lecture students are not actively engaged with the topic, they don’t seem to listen for very long, and their retention of concepts is minimal.  Studies show that students are not attentive 40% of the time they are in class and that although attention is high for the first 15 minutes, it declines rapidly until the final 10 minutes of class.  About 10 years ago, I began to hear about student-centered teaching strategies, but I saw little of it at the college level.  Now that is beginning to change.  Don Paulson , Chemistry, California State University, reports that the use of active-learning strategies from 1994-1998  provided an average retention rate of 75% for one year of organic chemistry compared to 38% when he used the lecture method.  In addition, he reports that students who learned with the intense active-learning approach in lecture did significantly better in both retention and GPA in the laboratory class.

Student Centered Strategies
In a student-centered classroom, students are encouraged to participate actively in learning the material as it is presented rather than being passive and perhaps taking notes quietly.  Students are involved throughout the class time in activities that help them construct their understanding of the material that is presented.  The instructor no longer delivers a vast amount of information, but uses a variety of hands-on activities to promote learning.
Students working in groups  As I learned more about student-centered learning environments, I began to alter the way I taught my chemistry classes.  I have now developed a group of learning strategies that I call LecturePLUS to promote Participation, Learning, Understanding, and Success.  My LecturePLUS system includes mini-lectures using PowerPoint presentations, in-class collaborative learning, peer presentations, ongoing assessment techniques, and “ChemWorks”, which are group homework projects.

Mini-Lectures
When I learned in a workshop that student attention span in lecture wanes after about 15 minutes, I began to repackage my lecture material.  Eventually I had a series of PowerPoint slides or CheModules that I utilize as mini-lectures.   In class, the students work out of a syllabus in which I included the Power Point notes.  I don’t include the solution slides in the notes, but show them after students have given their answers.  The same modules are available on my web site for review and do include the solutions.In the classroom, I use a simple media cart with the presentation system on the top level along with my laptop.   A VCR on the middle level allows me to show videos full screen through the presentation projector.  

PowerPoint Chemodules
Thesee are tutorials in PowerPoint© that I use as mini-lectures and short learning checks to continually check the understanding and progress of students. I have written several CheModules to help students  learn the chemistry concepts typically found in the allied health and preparatory chemistry courses.

Formative Assessment
In many of our classrooms, we often have a large gap before we test students on the material we discuss in our classes. After the first exam, we are surprised and disappointed by what they students did not learn by this time.  It is often too late to make up for the material that was missed.  I realized that I wanted to know what students were thinking and learning each day while we were in class.  To do this, I integrated learning checks within the PowerPoint slides of my CheModules.  In the sample slides, there are learning checks IC1 and IC2.  These learning checks are a type of formative assessment techniques, which is a non-graded assessment that occurs throughout the class time. 
       
When a learning check appears in a module, I give students time to work out the answers, individually at first, and then in groups.  Many of the learning checks involve short multiple-choice or fill in questions.  For the multiple-choice questions, every student has a set of three cards with large numbers 1, 2 and 3 on them.  I made these from card stock.  When I call for answer cards, everyone raises the card(s) that indicate their answers.   
         
The results in class serve as a discussion of the concepts.  Students get a quick assessment of their own learning and what they need to work on.  The learning checks are a way for students to continually adjust their understanding.  The also encourage questions.  At the same time, I can determine what is working in my mini-lectures and what needs more attention.  The ability to adapt to particular needs has results in some of the most productive teaching I have ever done. There are a variety of other types of formative assessments that can be used in a chemistry class to assess what students are thinking and learning each day.  Several are described below:

Clarification Pause  A quick way to add some active learning to a classroom is to take a lecture break every 15-20 minutes.  This means that I stop talking for about 2 minutes while students discuss the ideas with each other, check and clarify their notes, and ask questions.  I circulate about the room and help them review the ideas.  This is a quick way to add student-centered learning that does not require prepared worksheets or other materials.

Shared Paragraph  During class or at the end of class, students are given a few minutes to write a short paragraph in their own words that explains that major ideas discusses that day.  They share their paragraphs with other students, and give feedback to each other.  They may turn the paragraphs in as they leave class.  I return them the next day and discuss any topics that were not clear.  I obtain instant feedback  in their thinking and students learn to summarize information.
Fish Bowl  At the beginning of class, each students writes a question pertaining to class content on a 3” x 5” card and places the card in a container.  I draw out some cards and read the questions to the class.  Students are expected to provide answers.  The discussion reviews topics that were unclear and gives students who would not ask a question in front of their peers a chance to present a question to the instructor.  Students learn to assess and articulate what they don’t know.  And I obtain feedback on the level of difficulty of various topics I present.

One-Minute Paper  Students are asked to write a short paper or paragraph for one minute.  This might be about a section in the chapter or about a concept we just worked on. They are turned in and I quickly look them over.  Students learn to clarify the ideas in the reading or lecture material.   The paper provides feedback to the instructor on student’s ability to understand the concepts in the text.  Here is an example of a one-minute paper:

When I collected the papers, I discovered that although students could do a mechanical calculation of a limiting reactant problem, they did not understand the concept.  This result prompted more discussion and analogies concerning limiting reactant concepts. 

 

 The benefit of using formative assessments is that instructors and students have an ongoing evaluation of what students understand and what needs more attention. The instructor adapts to the needs of the class by adding another example, challenging thinking, or moving on to the next topic. 

Worksheets for Group Work in Class
Within each set of PowerPoint
notes in the syllabus , I integrate worksheets for collaborative learning during class. Students work in study teams applying the concepts immediately and problem-solving together.  Learning is enhanced when students become engaged in the processing of information.  Here is an example of one page of a team worksheet done by groups of students in class. __________________________________________________________________

Naming and Writing Ionic Formulas                                                Worksheet 4.3

 1. Determine the formula and name of the ionic compound containing the following ions: 

Ions

Formula

Name

Na+ and O2- 

 

 

Al3+  and S2

 

 

Ba2+  and Cl-

 

 

K+ and P3-

 

 

 2.  Why is Na+ named sodium ion, while Fe2+ must be named as an iron (II) ion?

 3.   Complete with formulas and names:

                 

               Cl-

    S2-

  N3-

   Li+

 

 

 

   Mg2+

 

 

 

   Fe3+

 

 

 

 4.   How do you determine the charge of the positive ion in CuO and Cu2O?

 

As students work together in the classroom, they think and use the language of chemistry.  They use peer instruction to fill in gaps in math and chemistry for each other by providing immediate feedback and correction to each other’s ideas.  I’ve found that peer instruction helps students begin to formulate questions about what they don’t understand and begin to model successful problem solving for their peers.  A former student comments, “The best part of working in groups is that students who are too shy to ask the professor for help can ask a member in the group”.  The importance of establishing a learning community that supports al the students in the class cannot be overrated.  Another student said, “The group methods helped me to understand the material for the first time.  In made chemistry enjoyable.”  One may argue that learning chemistry may not always be so enjoyable, but if too much of it is not, the student will often leave the class.

 

Peer Presentations  
When we are ready to review several chapters for an exam, I hand out a review worksheet or assign a different questions from the text to each study team in the classroom.  I have done this with classes up to 200 students.  Students manage to find a way to work together regardless of the shape of the classroom or lecture hall.  They discuss the problem and write up a solution on a transparency.  After 15 minutes, one or two students describe their solution to the class using an overhead projector.  I am always impressed with the ability of students to articulate their work and to teach a class.  I interject a thought or clarification as needed, but most of the time it is a student who asks a question or makes a suggestion.  As long as students are given the time to prepare their solution, the peer presentation is a positive experience that strengthens the self-confidence of many students.

Group Homework Projects “ChemWorks”
In the process of changing to a more student-centered classroom, I found that I said less but taught more.   For example, I no longer work problem after problem in class as students snooze.  Now students work out problems together using group problem solving homework worksheets I call “ChemWorks”. They must get together outside of class with their study teams and work on these homework sets.  They have different ways to do this.  Some do all the work together.  Others assign problems to work on their own and then get together to go over the work .  Others email back and forth on their computers.  Because I don’t cover all the material in class, they must learn from their textbooks and other resources.  At the beginning of each exam (I give 5), one ChemWorks paper is turned in for each study team and each member receives the same grade.  
         Small-group learning has the benefit of engaging students, sharing teaching and learning, connecting more learning styles, developing higher-order thinking skills, helping students to reflect and increasing success and retention.  By working in groups, students learn to take more responsibility for their own learning, which is a process that is important in today’s Internet world.  A student comments,” As each student brings knowledge or insight to the group, the pieces begin to fit together like a puzzle so that basic learn concepts can be applied to a wide variety of situation.  You take a more active and responsible role in your learning.”

Tips for Adding Student-Centered Learning in the Classroom
If an instructor wants to move toward a student-centered classroom, I have some tips on getting started.  Begin using active strategies the first day and start small.  Students will know that your course will be different from the traditional lecture format.  Clarify procedures and provide a non-threatening environment. Discuss the appropriate behavior for students when they work in groups.  Experiment with various activity to find those that are most comfortable and workable within ones own teaching style.  Adapt the various activities to fit your class.  Be prepared to find out what students do no learn. 
           
There will be mixed reactions from students but I have seen students start a semester thinking this was a ridiculous way to teach and end the semester begging me to teach their next class.  Since I started using more interactive techniques, I have become keenly aware that students do not learn the same ways; in fact, they have vastly different ways of processing information and learning how to think.

Conclusions
Student collaboration and peer instruction using non-graded classroom assessments and team worksheets in a student-centered classroom provides continuous feedback to both students and instructor throughout the class time. Students interact with each other as well as the instructor, which means they are processing ideas and learning. They are using new vocabulary in a non-intimating setting and participating in problem solving as they work and explain concepts to other students.  The introduction of a student-centered classroom is an exciting way to put learning back in teaching while providing students with the tools for lifelong learning and success. 

        For me, the move to more student-centered teaching has been a most exciting way to put learning back into teaching while providing students with the tools for lifelong learning and success.  Now I say less and enjoy teaching more!

Acknowledgments
Several of my colleagues have been influential in guide my ideas towards student-centered learning.  They include Kenneth Anderson, Department of Biology and Microbiology, Joan Clemons, Department of Geography, Los Angeles Valley College, California State University, Los Angeles, Donald R. Paulson, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Los Angeles, Diana C. Shakarian, Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, California State University, Fullerton , William D. Timberlake, Los Angeles Harbor College, Wilmington., and Jamie Webb, California State University , Los Angeles.  This work was supported in part by The Title III Grant, Los Angeles Valley College, Strengthening Institutions Program for Hispanic Serving Institutions, U.S. Department of Education and The Los Angeles Collaborative for Teacher Excellence (LACTE) National Science Foundation, grant DUE-9453608.

Suggested Readings

Angelo, T. A.; Classroom Rresearch:Early Lessons from Success; New Directions for Teaching and
    
Learning No. 46: Jossey-Bass  1991 San Francisco

Angelo, T.A: Cross, K.P.   Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers
    
Jossey-Bass 1993, San Francisco

Bonwell, C.C.; Eison, J..A.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom.   ASHE-ERIC
        Higher Education Report No. 1. Association for the Study of Higher Edication: Washington, D.C.; 1991

Herron, D. The Chemistry Classroom, Formulas for Successful Teaching;  American Chemical Society:
           Washington, DC, 1996

Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A User’s manual;  Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997

Mazur, E, Conceptests; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NH 1996

McLeish, J.  The Lecture Method.  Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.  1998

Nelson, C.T. In New Paradigms for College Teaching; Campbell, W.E.: Smith, K.A., Eds.; Interaction Book
        Co.: Edina MN 1997, pp 51-77

Nelson, C.T. In Enhancing Critical Thinking in the Sciences;  Crow, L.W., Ed.; Society for College
       Science Teacher: Washington, DC. 1989,pp   17-27

 Paulson, D.R., Active Learning and Cooperative Learning in the Organic Chemistry Lecture Class, J.
       Chem Ed. 1999, 76, 1136-1140

 Pollio, H.R. What Students Think About and do in College Lecture Classes.  Teaching-Learning
      
Issues, No. 53.  : University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1984

 Rowe, M.B.J: Pausing Principles and Their Effects on Reasoning in Science.  New Directions in
    
Community Colleges, 31, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco 1980 ; pp 27-34

 Rowe, M.B.J.  Getting Chemistry Off the Killer Course List.  Journal of Chemical Education.  60  (11),
     954-956; 1983

 Shakarian, D.C.  Beyond Lecture; Active Learning Strategies that Work, J. Physical Education, Recreation
     and Dance,1995, 66  pp. 21-24.

 Stuart, J., & Rutherford, R. J. D.  Medical Students Concentration During Lectures. Lancet , 2, 514-
    516.  1987

 Tobias. S. They’re Not Dumb, They’re Just Different; Stalking the Second Tier:  Research Corporation: 
     
Tucson, AZ, 1990